|
|
|
Madam Chair, I make this intervention on behalf of the National Indigenous Working Group on Native Title (NIWG) and the Foundation for Aboriginal and Islander Research Action (FAIRA). In Australia the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples have experienced, in this decade, the 'highs' and 'lows' of our political struggle for recognition of our Land Rights The high point is the recent 'discovery' in Australian law that our indigenous title to land must be respected. Some other important findings are:
Regrettably, the low points are many, including:
The list goes on and on. In reality, many of the issues of concern for Indigenous Peoples in Australia emanate from the racial discrimination by the Australian Government. The Australian Government has used its powers to make a law to extinguish indigenous title to land, or otherwise to impair the exercise of our ownership. The law is a monstrosity because:
It is on this final point that this paper now focusses. The Native Title Act was passed in Australia at the end of 1993. The legislation observed certain fundamental principles which had been established in limited negotiations with some Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander persons. These principles included:
Following a change of Australian Government in 1996, the Australian Government set about to destroy the rights of indigenous people to own land. This was accomplished in June 1998 when the Australian Government passed the Native Title Amendment Act 1998. Following the passage of the amendments to the Native Title Act, the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), using its early warning procedure, called on Australia to provide it with information about these amendments. After considering the Australian Australian Government's written and oral submissions, the CERD committee expressed its concern over the compatibility of the amended Native Title Act with Australia's international obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (the Convention). In particular, the CERD Committee considered that to "wind back the protections of indigenous title offered in the Mabo decision and the 1993 Native Title Act "raises concerns about compliance with Articles 2 and 5 of the Convention. The lack of effective participation by indigenous communities in the formulation of the amendments was also thought by the CERD Committee to breach Article 5(c) of the Convention. The CERD Committee decided that the Native Title Amendment Act 1998 discriminates against indigenous title holders by validating past acts, extinguishing native title, upgrading non-indigenous title and restricting our right to negotiate. For these reasons, CERD called on Australia to: "address these concerns as a matter of urgency to suspend implementation of the 1998 amendments and reopen discussions with the representatives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples with a view to finding solutions acceptable to the indigenous peoples and which would comply with Australia's obligations under the Convention". Aboriginal people, through the National Indigenous Working Group on Native Title, called on the Prime Minister to reaffirm the Australian Government's commitment to the principles of non-discrimination by agreeing to meet with us to find ways of removing racially discriminatory provisions from the legislation. To date the Prime Minister has not agreed to making such a commitment nor to meeting with our representatives to negotiate the matter. Further, the Australian Government formally objected to a visit to Australia by members of the CERD Committee to meet with representatives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, Australian Governments and the Parliament. Such a visit would have allowed the Committee to get a better understanding of the racially discriminatory nature of the day to day operations of the legislation. Madam Chair, I conclude this paper by commenting upon the unanswered case of racial discrimination against the Australian Government. Are we really expected to participate within the United Nations framework in a discussion of our rights with the Australian Government while it has an unaddressed case of racial discrimination against it? Is the Australian Government going to explain here why it has recently passed legislation which is in breach of one of the most fundamental, the most central, planks of the United Nation's jurisdiction on human rights? Are the governments of the world prepared to accept that the Australian Government can commit acts of racial discrimination, starting from 1998, to extinguish the Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples? Madam Chair, you called for attention to the International Decade on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. For the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, we must ask:
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIRA
Aboriginal Corporation |